Cardiometabolic Inflammation and Early Vascular Dysfunction: Expanding the Frontiers of Cardiovascular Risk Stratification
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64784/132Palabras clave:
cardiometabolic risk, systemic inflammation, early cardiovascular disease, arterial stiffness, metabolic syndrome, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, risk stratification, vascular dysfunction, precision preventionResumen
Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, despite significant advances in lipid management and risk factor control. Emerging evidence indicates that cardiometabolic dysfunction and chronic low-grade inflammation act synergistically to accelerate early vascular injury long before the onset of overt clinical events. This review integrates contemporary epidemiological data, mechanistic insights, biomarker analyses, and randomized clinical trial evidence to examine the cardiometabolic–inflammatory–vascular axis as a unified framework for early cardiovascular risk assessment. Population-level data confirm the sustained global expansion of cardiovascular burden, paralleled by increasing prevalence of metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance. Inflammatory biomarkers such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 demonstrate graded associations with incident cardiovascular events, independent of traditional risk factors. Arterial stiffness emerges as a measurable intermediate phenotype reflecting cumulative metabolic and inflammatory exposure, with higher quartiles associated with substantially increased event rates. Furthermore, randomized trials targeting inflammatory pathways show reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events in selected high-risk populations, supporting inflammation as a modifiable contributor to atherosclerotic progression. The integration of inflammatory biomarkers into traditional prediction models yields modest but consistent improvements in discrimination and risk stratification. These findings collectively support a paradigm shift toward earlier biological detection of vascular dysfunction. Such an approach is particularly relevant for regions experiencing rapid growth in cardiometabolic risk, including Mexico, Colombia, and Ecuador. Advancing cardiovascular prevention will require integrative strategies that combine metabolic control, inflammatory assessment, and early vascular evaluation within a precision-based framework.
Referencias
1. Achacoso, N. N., et al. (2022). Machine learning for outbreak prediction using electronic health records. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 128, 104056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104056
2. Bagavathi, A., & Thomas, D. (2023). Deep learning in epidemic forecasting: A systematic review. Epidemics, 42, 100646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2023.100646
3. Bansal, S., Grenfell, B. T., & Meyers, L. A. (2016). Big data for infectious disease surveillance and modeling. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 214(Suppl 4), S375–S379. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiw344
4. Choi, B. C. K. (2024). Public health surveillance and the data, information, and knowledge continuum. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 48, e9. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2024.9
5. Eysenbach, G. (2009). Infodemiology and infoveillance: Framework for public health informatics. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11(1), e11. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1157
6. Fallatah, D. I., & Adekola, H. A. (2024). Digital epidemiology: Harnessing big data for early detection and monitoring of viral outbreaks. Infection Prevention in Practice, 6(2), 100382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100382
7. Hossain, M. S., et al. (2023). AI accuracy in real-time epidemiological trend detection. Journal of Medical Systems, 47(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-023-01840-8
8. Jordan, R. A. (2024). Big data in epidemiology: Brave new world? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345241272034
9. Kamel Boulos, M. N., & Geraghty, E. M. (2020). Geospatial big data in public health. International Journal of Health Geographics, 19, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-020-00201-3
10. Lee, J. S., Kwon, S., & Chae, S. (2018). Predicting infectious disease using deep learning and big data. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(8), 1596. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081596
11. Lipsitch, M., et al. (2020). Ethics of AI and big data use in public health surveillance. Science Translational Medicine, 12(569), eaay1459. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aay1459
12. Madah, N., et al. (2023). Effectiveness of public health digital surveillance systems for infectious disease prevention and control. BMC Public Health, 23, 10238. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-10238-952
13. Muhunzi, D. (2024). Big data analytics in the healthcare sector: Applications to population health management and decision support. Health Informatics Journal, 30(4), 14604582241294217. https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582241294217
14. Nguyen, T., et al. (2021). Privacy and security challenges with big data epidemiology. Big Data Research, 24, 100183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdr.2021.100183
15. Roberts, M. C., et al. (2024). Precision public health in the era of genomics and big data. Nature Medicine, 30(7), 1865–1873. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03098-0
16. Salathé, M., et al. (2020). Digital epidemiology: What is it, and where is it going? PLoS Computational Biology, 16(7), e1007850. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007850
17. Shah, H. A., & Shah, J. (2024). Concepts, objectives and analysis of public health surveillance systems. Concepts in Epidemiology, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cepi.2024.03.005
18. Velmovitsky, P. E., et al. (2021). Convergence of precision medicine and public health: Toward a big data perspective. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 561873. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.561873
19. World Health Organization. (2020). Global public health surveillance strategy 2020–2025. WHO Press.
20. Zhang, Y., Milinovich, G., Xu, Z., et al. (2021). Monitoring pertussis infections using internet search queries. Scientific Reports, 11, 8656. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88045-6
