Rebuilding Function After Stroke: Emerging Technologies and New Frontiers in Neurological Recovery

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64784/265

Palabras clave:

stroke, digital neurorehabilitation, virtual reality, robot-assisted rehabilitation, neuroplasticity, functional recovery, telerehabilitation, brain-computer interface, artificial intelligence, wearable technologies

Resumen

Stroke remains a major cause of long-term neurological disability worldwide, creating a growing need for rehabilitation strategies capable of promoting functional recovery through intensive, repetitive, task-oriented, and personalized interventions. Digital neurorehabilitation has emerged as a multidisciplinary approach that integrates neuroscience, physical and rehabilitation medicine, neurology, and biomedical engineering through technologies such as virtual reality, robot-assisted rehabilitation, brain-computer interfaces, wearable sensors, artificial intelligence, and telerehabilitation. This review analyzed international scientific evidence regarding the application of these technologies after stroke, with particular attention to their relationship with experience-dependent neuroplasticity, functional outcomes, implementation challenges, and applicability across different healthcare environments, including Latin America. Scientific evidence was identified and critically synthesized from internationally recognized databases, prioritizing randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, clinical guidelines, and relevant contemporary studies. The reviewed literature showed that virtual reality and robot-assisted rehabilitation constitute the most extensively investigated technological approaches, with favorable findings particularly in upper-limb motor function, balance, gait, functional mobility, and activities of daily living. Telerehabilitation and wearable technologies provide additional opportunities for extending therapeutic continuity and objective monitoring beyond specialized rehabilitation facilities, while brain-computer interfaces and artificial intelligence represent emerging approaches for neural feedback and personalized rehabilitation. Despite these advances, considerable heterogeneity remains regarding intervention protocols, technological platforms, therapeutic intensity, outcome measures, and patient characteristics. Furthermore, acquisition costs, infrastructure requirements, professional training, accessibility, connectivity, and digital literacy continue to influence implementation, particularly in resource-constrained healthcare systems. Current evidence supports digital technologies as complementary components of multidisciplinary stroke rehabilitation rather than substitutes for conventional therapy. Future research should prioritize standardized protocols, multicenter studies, long-term functional outcomes, cost-effectiveness, equitable accessibility, and greater representation of Latin American populations to advance toward evidence-based precision neurorehabilitation.

Referencias

• Bernhardt, J., Hayward, K. S., Dancause, N., Lannin, N. A., Ward, N. S., Nudo, R. J., Corbett, D., & Cramer, S. C. (2017). A stroke recovery trial development framework: Consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. International Journal of Stroke, 12(5), 444–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493017711818

• Calabrò, R. S., Calderone, A., Bonanno, L., Quartarone, A., Naro, A., De Nunzio, A. M., & Filoni, S. (2026). Robot-assisted upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cortical reorganization and neuroplasticity biomarkers. Neural Plasticity, 2026, 9282578. https://doi.org/10.1155/np/9282578

• Cramer, S. C. (2018). Treatments to promote neural repair after stroke. Journal of Stroke, 20(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.5853/jos.2017.02796

• De Iaco, L., Veerbeek, J. M., Ket, J. C. F., & Kwakkel, G. (2024). Upper limb robots for recovery of motor arm function in patients with stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology, 103(2), e209495. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000209495

• Demeco, A., Marotta, N., Barletta, M., Pino, I., Marinaro, C., Petraroli, A., Moggio, L., & Ammendolia, A. (2023). Immersive virtual reality in post-stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review. Sensors, 23(3), 1712. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031712

• European Stroke Organisation. (2021). Guideline on stroke rehabilitation and recovery. European Stroke Organisation.

• Feigin, V. L., Stark, B. A., Johnson, C. O., et al. (2021). Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019. The Lancet Neurology, 20(10), 795–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0

• Hao, J., Yao, Z., Harp, K., Gwon, Y., Chen, Z., & Siu, K.-C. (2023). Effects of virtual reality in the early-stage stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 39(12), 2569–2588. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2022.2094302

• Hao, J., Pu, Y., Chen, Z., & Siu, K.-C. (2023). Effects of virtual reality-based telerehabilitation for stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 32(3), 106960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106960

• Langhorne, P., Bernhardt, J., & Kwakkel, G. (2011). Stroke rehabilitation. The Lancet, 377(9778), 1693–1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5

• Laver, K. E., Lange, B., George, S., Deutsch, J. E., Saposnik, G., & Crotty, M. (2017). Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (11), CD008349. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008349.pub4

• Levin, M. F., Weiss, P. L., & Keshner, E. A. (2015). Emergence of virtual reality as a tool for upper limb rehabilitation. Physical Therapy, 95(3), 415–425. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20130579

• Organización Panamericana de la Salud. (2023). Las enfermedades cardiovasculares en la Región de las Américas. OPS.

• Platz, T. (Ed.). (2021). Clinical pathways in stroke rehabilitation (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58505-1

• Su, T., Wang, M., Chen, Z., & Feng, L. (2024). Effect of upper robot-assisted training on upper limb motor, daily life activities, and muscular tone in patients with stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain and Behavior, 14, e70117. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70117

• Teasell, R., Hussein, N., Foley, N., et al. (2023). Evidence-Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation (EBRSR). McMaster University.

• Winstein, C. J., Stein, J., Arena, R., et al. (2016). Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery. Stroke, 47(6), e98–e169. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000098

• World Health Organization. (2022). World stroke fact sheet 2022. World Health Organization.

• World Stroke Organization. (2022). Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2022. World Stroke Organization.

• Zhang, B., Wong, K. P., Kang, R., Fu, S., Qin, J., & Xiao, Q. (2023). Efficacy of robot-assisted and virtual reality interventions on balance, gait, and daily function in patients with stroke: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 104(10), 1711–1719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2023.04.005

Publicado

2026-07-31

Cómo citar

Rebuilding Function After Stroke: Emerging Technologies and New Frontiers in Neurological Recovery (Benitez Barrios Sosimo Isaac, Melany Patricia Bolagay Apráez, Dr. Robinson Alexander Morey Contreras, Miguel Alberto Montañez Romero, Juan José Vergara Serpa, PhD, Joseph Rodríguez Sánchez, Alexa Fernanda Uriostegui Navarro, & Jorge Angel Velasco Espinal, Trans.). (2026). IECCMEXICO, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.64784/265