Congenital Hand Differences in Childhood: Integrating Genetic Diagnosis, Reconstructive Strategies, and Long-Term Functional Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64784/337Palabras clave:
congenital hand malformations, congenital upper-limb differences, genetics, pediatric hand surgery, reconstructive surgery, syndactyly, polydactyly, thumb hypoplasia, pollicization, radial longitudinal deficiency, functional outcomes, child development, rehabilitation, quality of lifeResumen
Congenital hand malformations comprise a heterogeneous group of developmental abnormalities that may affect anatomy, function, growth, and psychosocial adaptation throughout childhood. Their management increasingly requires the integration of genetic diagnosis, phenotypic characterization, reconstructive planning, rehabilitation, and long-term functional assessment. This study analyzed the principal genetic, anatomical, surgical, developmental, and psychosocial factors involved in congenital hand differences through a structured integrative review based on the scientific method. Evidence from contemporary classifications, pediatric registries, reconstructive series, and long-term functional studies was examined, with particular attention to syndactyly, polydactyly, thumb duplication, thumb hypoplasia, radial longitudinal deficiency, and index-finger pollicization. The findings showed substantial diagnostic heterogeneity and demonstrated that greater anatomical involvement was associated with lower upper-extremity and global functional scores. However, functional limitation did not necessarily correspond to proportional emotional or social impairment. Long-term reconstructive outcomes revealed persistent reductions in grip and pinch strength after some procedures, while dexterity and practical hand use could remain comparatively preserved, highlighting the role of developmental adaptation. Revision surgery, recurrent deformity, and secondary procedures were also identified across several reconstructive strategies, emphasizing the influence of growth on long-term results. Overall, the evidence supports a multidisciplinary and longitudinal model in which therapeutic success is defined not exclusively by anatomical correction but by the interaction among structural stability, function, adaptation, independence, participation, and quality of life. Future prospective multicenter studies integrating genetic, surgical, and patient-reported outcomes are required to improve individualized decision-making in pediatric congenital hand care.
Referencias
• Baas, M., Stubbs, A. P., van Zessen, D. B., Galjaard, R.-J. H., van der Spek, P. J., Hovius, S. E. R., & van Nieuwenhoven, C. A. (2017). Identification of associated genes and diseases in patients with congenital upper-limb anomalies: A novel application of the OMT classification. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 42(7), 533–545.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.03.043
• Bae, D. S., Canizares, M. F., Miller, P. E., Waters, P. M., & Goldfarb, C. A. (2018). Functional impact of congenital hand differences: Early results from the Congenital Upper Limb Differences (CoULD) Registry. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 43(4), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.10.006
• Barik, S., Matic, I., & Farr, S. (2024). Long-term results of index finger pollicization for congenital thumb anomalies: A systematic review. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 49(7), 892–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934231212392
• Colen, D. L., Lin, I. C., Levin, L. S., & Chang, B. (2017). Radial longitudinal deficiency: Recent developments, controversies, and an evidence-based guide to treatment. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 42(7), 546–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.04.012
• Dy, C. J., Swarup, I., & Daluiski, A. (2014). Embryology, diagnosis, and evaluation of congenital hand anomalies. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 7(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-014-9201-7
• Franzblau, L. E., Chung, K. C., Carlozzi, N., Chin, A. Y. T., Nellans, K. W., & Waljee, J. F. (2015). Coping with congenital hand differences. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 135(4), 1067–1075. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001047
• Goldfarb, C. A., Ezaki, M., Wall, L. B., Lam, W. L., & Oberg, K. C. (2020). The Oberg-Manske-Tonkin (OMT) classification of congenital upper extremities: Update for 2020. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 45(6), 542–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.01.002
• Gowrie, S., Omosebi, O., Veith, P., Agarwal, N., Shah, S., Montalbano, M., Tubbs, R. S., & Loukas, M. (2025). Stuck together: A systematic review of hand syndactyly. Cureus, 17(4), e81943. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.81943
• Gurrieri, F., & Everman, D. B. (2013). Clinical, genetic, and molecular aspects of split-hand/foot malformation: An update. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 161A(11), 2860–2872. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.36239
• Hellevuo, C., Leppänen, O. V., Kapanen, S., & Vilkki, S. K. (2020). Long-term outcomes after pollicization: A mean 11-year follow-up study. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 45(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193419876475
• Kelley, B. P., Franzblau, L. E., Chung, K. C., Carlozzi, N., & Waljee, J. F. (2016). Hand function and appearance following reconstruction for congenital hand differences: A qualitative analysis of children and parents. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 138(1), 73e–81e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002286
• Mende, K., Suurmeijer, J. A., & Tonkin, M. A. (2019). Surgical techniques for reconstruction of the hypoplastic thumb. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 44(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193418793579
• Mende, K., Watson, A., & Stewart, D. A. (2020). Surgical treatment and outcomes of syndactyly: A systematic review. Journal of Hand Surgery Asian-Pacific Volume, 25(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835520300017
• Patel, N. K., Toyoda, Y., Grunzweig, K. A., Shah, A. S., & Mendenhall, S. D. (2023). Recent advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of congenital hand differences. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 31(15), 766–782. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00302
• Sullivan, M. A., & Adkinson, J. M. (2016). Congenital hand differences. Plastic Surgical Nursing, 36(2), 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSN.0000000000000133
• Tonkin, M. (2011). Surgical reconstruction of congenital thumb hypoplasia. Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery, 44(2), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.85347
• Tonkin, M. A. (2017). Classification of congenital anomalies of the hand and upper limb. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 42(5), 448–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193417690965
• Van Wyhe, R. D., Trost, J. G., Koshy, J. C., & Pederson, W. C. (2016). The duplicated thumb: A review. Seminars in Plastic Surgery, 30(4), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1593736
• Wall, L. B., Ezaki, M., & Oishi, S. N. (2013). Management of congenital radial longitudinal deficiency: Controversies and current concepts. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 132(1), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318290fca5
• Wessel, L. E., Daluiski, A., & Trehan, S. K. (2020). Polydactyly: A review and update of a common congenital hand difference. Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 32(1), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000000871
