GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Internal Medicine: Beyond Diabetes Toward Multisystem Disease Modification
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64784/010Palabras clave:
Agonistas del receptor GLP-1, medicina interna, enfermedades crónicas, salud cardiovascular, protección renal, trastornos metabólicosResumen
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have emerged as a cornerstone in modern internal medicine, demonstrating multisystem benefits that extend far beyond glycemic control. This review examines their cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, and metabolic effects, integrating evidence from major clinical trials and meta-analyses. The objective was to analyze and synthesize scientific evidence on the systemic impact of GLP-1 RAs, emphasizing their mechanisms, clinical relevance, and potential integration into internal medicine and public health strategies in Latin America. A systematic literature review was conducted following the DMAIC framework (Define–Measure–Analyze–Improve–Control). Twenty peer-reviewed studies published between 2016 and 2025 were selected from PubMed, Scopus, and The Lancet databases. Data were categorized by clinical domain and analyzed for efficacy trends and mechanistic consistency. Results showed that GLP-1 RAs consistently reduced major adverse cardiovascular events, slowed chronic kidney disease progression, improved hepatic inflammation and fibrosis, and achieved sustained weight reduction of 10–17%. Their multisystem effects were mediated by endothelial restoration, anti-inflammatory modulation, and metabolic reprogramming. GLP-1 receptor agonists represent a paradigm shift in internal medicine by integrating cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, and metabolic protection into a unified therapeutic model. Their adoption in Latin American health systems could reduce premature mortality, align regional policies with Sustainable Development Goal 3, and establish GLP-1 RAs as disease-modifying agents in global chronic disease prevention.
Referencias
Abushamat, L. A., et al. (2024). The emerging role of GLP-1 receptor agonists in MASLD/MASH. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 22(11), 2423–2436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2024.03.012
Adamou, A., Barkas, F., Milionis, H., & Ntaios, G. (2024). GLP-1 receptor agonists and stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of CVOTs. International Journal of Stroke, 19(8), 876–887. https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930241253988
American Diabetes Association. (2025). Summary of revisions: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025. Diabetes Care, 48(Suppl. 1), S6–S9. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-SREV
Davies, M., et al. (2021). Semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly in adults with overweight/obesity and type 2 diabetes (STEP 2). The Lancet, 397(10278), 971–984. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00213-0
Deanfield, J., et al. (2024). Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with overweight or obesity: A prespecified SELECT analysis. The Lancet, 403(10421), 1447–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01498-3
Gerstein, H. C., et al. (2019). Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND). The Lancet, 394(10193), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31149-3
Hernandez, A. F., et al. (2018). Harmony Outcomes: Albiglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes and ASCVD. The Lancet, 392(10157), 1519–1529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32261-X
Husain, M., et al. (2019). Oral semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (PIONEER 6). The New England Journal of Medicine, 381(9), 841–851. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1901118
Kittipibul, V., et al. (2024). Effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists on heart failure outcomes: Mechanisms and evidence. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 84(9), 937–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2024.08.016
Kosiborod, M., et al. (2023). Semaglutide in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and obesity. The New England Journal of Medicine, 389(14), 1290–1301. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2306963
Kristensen, S. L., et al. (2019). Cardiovascular, mortality, and kidney outcomes with GLP-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes: Systematic review and meta-analysis of CVOTs. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 7(10), 776–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30249-9
Lincoff, A. M., et al. (2023). Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in obesity without diabetes. The New England Journal of Medicine, 389(21), 1963–1974. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2307563
Mann, J. F. E., et al. (2018). Effects of liraglutide versus placebo on cardiovascular events across KDIGO stages: LEADER secondary analyses. Circulation, 138(25), 2908–2918. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036418
Marso, S. P., et al. (2016). Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN-6). The New England Journal of Medicine, 375(19), 1834–1844. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1607141
Newsome, P. N., et al. (2021). A placebo-controlled trial of subcutaneous semaglutide in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. The New England Journal of Medicine, 384(12), 1113–1124. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2028395
Perkovic, V., et al. (2024). Effects of semaglutide on chronic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes (FLOW). The New England Journal of Medicine, 390(22), 2036–2048. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2403347
Rubino, D. M., et al. (2021). Effect of continued weekly semaglutide vs placebo on weight-loss maintenance (STEP 4). JAMA, 325(14), 1414–1425. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.3224
Sanyal, A. J., et al. (2025). Phase 3 trial of semaglutide in metabolic dysfunction–associated steatohepatitis with fibrosis. The New England Journal of Medicine, 392(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2413258
Sattar, N., et al. (2021). GLP-1 receptor agonists and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: An updated meta-analysis. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 9(10), 653–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00203-5
Wilding, J. P. H., et al. (2021). Once-weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity (STEP 1). The New England Journal of Medicine, 384(11), 989–1002. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2032183